Is it news? Is it good?
Review of Tom Wright, Simply
Good News: Why the Gospel in News and What Makes it Good (SPCK, 2015).
A new Tom Wright book is often a treat, but I confess to
being a little under-inspired by the title of this one. Perhaps it sounded like just another book on
the Gospels and their historical basis.
I was wrong, this book has lots to say and is more than another history
of Jesus.
In fact this is a book about evangelism, about the practice
of commending Christian faith to those who are outside the church. What Wright does really well is to use his
knowledge of history to explain what telling the gospel meant in the New
Testament and what the implications of that are for today.
He starts from the (hardly controversial) observation that
the gospel is good news. That is simply
what the Greek work euangelion
(gospel) means. It was used to announce
the births, successions and victories of Roman emperors. Rather brilliantly, Wright distinguishes
between this original sense of good news and the way in which this has been
adapted in the practice of the church to become ‘good advice’. “The whole point of advice is to make you do
something to get a desired result … News is an announcement that something
significant has happened” (p. 4). This
shift from news to advice has distorted the good news that the church has told.
Through accounts of both Paul and Jesus, Wright offers his
version of the Good News. “The good news
is that the one true God has now taken
charge of the world … all this has
happened in and through Jesus; that one day it will happen, completely and utterly, to all creation; and that we humans, every single one of us,
whoever we are, can be caught up in that transformation here and now. This is the Christian gospel. Do not allow yourself to be fobbed off with
anything less” (p. 55).
The church has got much of this wrong. There are those parts of the church who have
forgotten that the gospel is news. Rationalists want to commend Christianity as
making sense and romantics want to emphasise the personal experience of God’s
presence. But both try to collect the
fruit without the roots of the happening at the start of Christianity. I suppose the implication is that either
rationalist or romantic Christianity could manage without Jesus. On the other hand, there are those who forget
that the gospel is good news and tell
stories of an angry God, sinful humanity and the sacrifice of Jesus to spare us
from God’s wrath. Wright points out that
this misses the role of creation in the Bible and downplays the love of
God. In doing so, this approach distorts
the gospel, and usually ends up in offering advice rather than news. Of course all of this has elements of a
caricature, but like a great cartoonist Wright highlights parts of our life
that need correcting. That someone of
Wright’s stature is lampooning the ‘two ways to live’ approach to evangelism is
significant.
In its place, Wright offers a gospel that has implications
for the whole of creation and for individuals; a gospel that is rooted in the
history of Jesus and that impacts on life today. This is a gospel that challenges the old ‘go
to heaven when you die’ approach, and makes demands on all of us to be
committed to new ways of life. In his
final chapter, Wright offers an account of how this gospel is prayed through
the Lord’s Prayer. Praying this prayer
makes us into good-news people, people who are able “not only to know and believe the good news but to become part of it ourselves” (p. 169).
There is more to say about this excellent little book. I found it excited me in a way I hadn’t
expected it to. If nothing else, it
offers a very helpful twofold test to prevent the good news becoming good
advice: does what it say constitute news? and is it good?
Comments